Reading while dead

Reading while dead

Tuesday, 17 May 2016

Facebook Posts

Almost everyday I find myself deleting an FB response because it will not endear me to the originator of the post. Sometimes these are quite long and thoughtful, and perhaps worth jotting down here.

In response to a post about a survey that discovered "shockingly" that 44% of people were "proud of the British Empire", which is clearly not something you are allowed to say in polite society, because you really need to be lacerating your breast and howling with shame, I posted this:


"I am neither proud nor ashamed, it was what it was, none of us were there to bring our 21stC liberal values into the frame. A few people black and white began to speak about the iniquities of it and gradually it faded away - that's history. So many people judge the past by contemporary values. And we tend to keep to the more recent past - I don't hear people getting all uptight about the feudal system in Europe, yet for centuries, millions of European peasants had to put in backbreaking toil for their feudal overlords in exchange for having a small patch of land on which to subsist...right up to the 19thC in some parts of Europe."

Monday, 11 April 2016

Some notes on a trauma

These are notes I made on the evening of Ned's accident in September 2015.

The worst bit, of so many worst bits, was seeing N with his nose hanging off - hunkered down and very still, not daring to move, bloody lumps of flesh hanging off his face like dark red clots.  And a pool of blood on the floor, endless dripping of blood, trying to get him to sit back.  

Incessant questions from the 999 handler:  "How much blood?"  "Still dripping?"  "Get a pad and hold it in position."   I knew I couldn't do that - I called Katie and Ruth - they came at once and were so good.

At the same time I was trying to sort out our AirBnB guest on the computer.  The paramedics came at last, and took him into the ambulance.  I came too.  They were working on him for hours.  When were we going to leave?  It took 30 minutes to strap him up - put in the cannula.  This was where Ned, who had been ultra calm, became panicky.  He calmed down once the morphine hit him.  Then he became more excitable, wanting to talk.  Mark tapping at the door, standing outside in the rain with an umbrella, wanting to know what was happening.  We are leaving for Ashford. I hadn't thought of this, I had assumed our local hospital.  Will I have to stay the night?  I need my Kindle, paper and pens.

I must be in shock too.  It's claustrophobic in the ambulance, it's like a mobile clinic, drawers, bins, intravenous drips, hooks etc.

It's a long journey - at last we reach the hospital, straight into a group of staff standing by.

Everyone is lovely, the two paramedics, both women, one northern, one southern, and Katie and everyone remarking how calm N is.  No shrieking - they are grateful.

Doctor's questions, nurse sorts N out, He's Turkish.  We also see a max-fax registrar, an older anaesthetist and a younger woman anaesthetist.

It's hard for N to talk - I answer questions.  He goes for a CT scan - his tooth apparently stuck in his lip.  He may have swallowed one, and needs a chest X-ray. They will keep him in over night in the head injury ward and operate in the morning, we hope.  Nil by mouth from 2 am, not that Ned fancies trying to eat or drink.
The nice max-fax doctor wipes his eyes clean, it's just closed with blood.  He can see, his eyes seem OK, thank God.    It's a strange thing that N has had three of these head injuries in his life, all of which have been pretty spectacular, but not serious in any long term way, simply resulting in scars or breakage.   More sound and fury than anything seriously wrong - a bit like N himself at times.

While Ned dozes I sit and listen to the people around me.  A doctor in the next cubicle is asking an old man about his wife.

"Does she smoke?"
"No she used to sing with a band and smoke a bit - but when I met her I said "it's cigarettes or me" and she chose me."
Later he tells the doctor that she's never been to hospital before.  She got Parkinson's but now it looks as though her kidneys have packed up.
"She's not in a good way" a woman says "We have to take more bloods".
She's clearly in pain, a lot of grunts and groans, heavy breathing, the curtain shaking violently.
She probably dying I suspect, but not in a good way.
Her husband jokes gamely with the nurses.  Someone probably told him to keep a smile in his voice when he was young.

Ned looks gruesome - head bandages padded over his mouth.  We haven't washed his hands.  I offered to but he said "No thanks".  They are covered with blood from where he held a succession of kitchen towels and sacrificial tea towels to his nose.  I guess we'll get rid of those now.

The lady next to us is going on a drip  "and we'll take it from there".  It's a sodium bicarb infusion.  It doesn't sound good.
"Let's hope she starts to improve."
"If she doesn't well, there's nothing we can do."
"Thank you very much" says a modest sounding female voice.
The doctor is breaking the death sentence down into manageable chunks.  She is thanking him.  It's nearly midnight.  Does she understand what he is saying?   Or is she just keeping it all under control?
The doctor is suggesting alternative treatment to the nurse.  Hypos? It all sounds grim, but they are still gamely trying to save her.

It's obviously sudden and shocking for her family - they were coping with the Parkinson's, but this sudden collapse is too much.  Suddenly, unable to wee, dehydrated, a build up of salts, perhaps an undiagnosed ulcer.  When I hear that I wonder if it's stomach cancer.

In the other cubicle a young thug of a child called Olly is resisting treatment with shouts and screams and considerable indignation.  I have the impression that he's hitting people.

I am ravenous, I haven't eaten for 10 hours.  One wants to be with the sufferer, but one has one's own adrenalin to cope with.  M will be here soon I suppose.  Its more than 90 minutes since I rang him.

"Let me breathe!" Gasps, whimpers.
A period of harsh breaths.  Is it the death rattle?   No, she recovers again, back to gasps.  A mask is put on, calming her.  Laboured breath, in grunts, laboured like a woman in labour.   The work of dying, the work of giving life.

Olly's cutting up rough again, screaming and kicking.
"No!"
I think they are trying to take blood or put a cannula in.  Or give an injection?
Whatever happened to tranquilliser darts?
The child is now shouting
"I want it in my other one!"
What?  Hand - arm - leg?
His shouts are making N agitated.

Then it's quiet for a while.  The woman's family have gone for a break.  There's bleeping from her cubicle.  The curtains are open and I see a tiny old woman curled up in bed,.Is she calmer because she doesn't have an audience, or have some drugs kicked in?
It's quiet - still no sign of M.  

The three stories of the evening could provide an episode of Casualty, suitably sexed up..

Tuesday, 22 March 2016

Brussels

Last Tuesday Finn set off for Brussels with a group of 6th Formers from his school.   They left very early in the morning, and I got a bit upset when I heard on the 3 pm news that there'd been a "shooting incident" in Brussels - so I went onto Facebook (the fourth emergency service) to find out what anyone knew.  The answer, of course, was that they were all fine and quite a way away from the shooting.  Finn reported that he didn't find out about it until after dinner and that the city was full of heavily armed men, military rather than police.

This morning, exactly one week later, we woke to the news of the multiple bombs on the metro and at the airport.  People are going to say all over again "Why don't we make this fuss about Burkina Faso or Ankara?" and I'm going to say again, because we haven't been there, we may only know one person, if any, who has been there; because Brussels is local - I could drive there in a couple of hours once I crossed the Channel... it's easier to get to than Birmingham (although I've never been of course - to Brussels).  And of course all the Brexit types are going to say "YOU SEE!  This is all because of immigration".   I am disgusted, saddened and, although it's frivolous to say it, bored, with all this.  Round and round it goes, there are a few initiatives that make things better, but over all 'they' do this shit to divide 'us' and make us argue with each other - and we fall for it. They do it for other reasons of course, but you would have to be a bit blinkered to think that religious faith, rather than political expedience was the real mover.  It is difficult to discern because Islam is a much more potentially theocratic religion than Christianity - we rather gave up on that idea by the 17thC (and earlier in a lot of places). ISIS are of course proclaiming their caliphate and the glory of sharia law, while we have to settle for dreary old man made law and precedent and living in a society where you get to vote on the government occasionally, but at least the Pope or Justin Welby doesn't make undemocratic pronouncements of what we can and can't do which have the force of law, and we no longer have to almost worship our royal families as though they were God's spokespeople.

Meanwhile...
The new IDS substitute turns out to be another right wing Christian who thinks homosexuality can be cured.  I just wish Toryism could be cured and they could all settle down and become collectively minded lefties.  He's called Stephen Crabb - I wonder if he's descended from Lionel "Buster" Crabb - the notorious spy frogman...who disappeared.  Probably not, L Crabb was gay I suspect - married late, divorced after 2 years, no kids and clearly more at ease in male company (yes, I know, only circumstantial evidence, but good enough for me at this time of night).


Sunday, 6 March 2016

katehamlyn.com

I have finally created a website for myself, chiefly to promote my literary efforts, which are more fully discussed in the other blog "Only writing"  katehamlyn.blogspot.co.uk.

I bought a domain name in late December, having been told by a number of people that I must get myself out there a bit more.  I also bought a very cheap bit of software called Website Builder that only cost about £3 or something.   I then looked at it and despaired.  Eventually, I called my friend Ruth, who designs websites for a living, to come and help me.  It was actually pretty straightforward, this is because it is limited in what it can do for you.  However, it doesn't look too bad and after Ruth and I had put it through its paces I spent parts of yesterday afternoon and this morning writing and straightening it up.  Remarkably I had plenty of pics to put on it, although Finn complained that the one of me was poor quality and cropped oddly.  However, there aren't many really nice pix of me (yes, I have residual vanity).

It was very exciting though to find that, having started the website on Friday that I had something simple and workwomanlike available to view on Sunday, and although there is a bit of a template, it's very flexible and effectively I designed it myself!   So, I am now competent to knock up websites for anyone, any time any where... as long as they are based on that simple model.

katehamlyn.com

Friday, 12 February 2016

Birthday

Today is my birthday and I have received an enormous amount of greetings from people, thanks to the glories of Facebook.  I have also had a reasonable number of Birthday cards and virtually no presents (except from Anna T and a couple from Mark - which are tokens because all I wanted was spending money for the Spanish trip).  M made a cake, and Finn made sure he did.,  We had fish and chips and half a bottle of fizz (I didn't like it for some reason, it was Freixenet Rosado, and it seemed a bit metallic, although I thought it was lovely at Christmas).

I had my first sweet food since I began the anti-inflammatory diet, and this evening I have had my first bout of cramp (in my thigh, and the front of my shin) for a month or so.  I cannot help feeling there could be a connection.  I feel very good, since I am now a stone less than I was at the beginning of January.   So on the whole, despite a few deficiencies, this has been a good birthday.

What made it good really was the fact that I have been terribly happy since Monday/Tuesday, when "my editor" in Ireland told me how much she loved The Malice of Fairies and that she would strongly recommend it to her publishing house.  So I have been working with her all week and she has been tremendously helpful, especially with Irish terminology...it's incredibly exciting to have someone who loves your work, and this has sustained me in happiness all week.  Also I managed to finish the re-writes today, and send them off to her, so I am kind of off the hook now, until I go to Spain (I think).

Saturday, 30 January 2016

Relate

We've been going to Relate, which, for non-Brits, is a service devoted to helping people with relationship problems.  Arguably we should have gone to it in about 2008, but it took a while to get around to it.  I tried in 2010 - but it went horribly wrong - and then we kept passing each other the contact details but neither of us did anything about it.   Then in December himself took the plunge, just in time for the New Year's Eve row...

So in early Jan we turned up at the Canterbury office.  It was exactly as my friend said, a waiting room with a gas fire in a nice old building.  In the consultation room I found myself wondering what had happened to the broken mouldings.  Our first appointment was a general "what do you want to get out of this?" session.  About 40 minutes in the counsellor suggested "So you really want to discuss ways of parting amicably?"
I wondered whether this was a "trick" question, to elicit a response.  3-5 years ago I might have said "Yes" but I'm more cautious now, and I like my house.  The truth is, we want to find out whether we do want to separate or not, because I don't know any more.  M was quite excited by the prospect a while back but he's calmed down a bit now.   There is a nagging feeling - did she ask that question to get that response?  Or was it what she had really concluded from our responses?   It reminded me of when James and I went to Westminster Pastoral Counselling and got the "We think your marriage is over" answer from the gang there.  I think this woman thought the same, but unless someone I love comes along and commands my love and affection, I am likely to remain in this situation until some people come to remove me in a box.  M is casting about, and if he gets this job in Portsmouth perhaps we'll get the trial separation. The experience of going to Relate is not an unpleasant process, because to a great extent we already know all this stuff about each other, although I occasionally find myself digging up horrifying examples of bad behaviour that I have buried and forgotten and forgiven and feeling surprisingly upset by them..

Tonight, to celebrate a new job, we went to our local Italian. We hadn't been for ages, but the waiter was immensely apologetic because there was no lamb "I am so sorry, and last time you were here I made a mistake..."  I assured him that I couldn't remember the mistake, only the good experiences (the limoncello, the flavoured butter, the nice food).  I felt remarkably cheerful (Citalopram and the anti-inflammatory diet!) and we had a second bottle of wine.  I walked there and back, which is extraordinary, I never used to do that even in my healthy days!  I must be getting better.  We decided not to go to the pub afterwards, as we had had our bout of sociability (our lovely Spanish teacher turned up along with Ned's old boss J - a married man, scandaloso!) and feared that A might be there (although we believe him to be in the Far East). That's the trouble with small towns, but also the delight.

Tuesday, 26 January 2016

Good bye to all that

I've been thinking about decluttering, because we have far too much stuff, and some of it I am very attached to but there are also items that are endlessly being moved from place to place.  Two ideas have come together: I heard someone say that one should get rid of one item a day. Years ago when we wanted to get rid of the kids' toys someone suggested we photograph them before getting rid of them, so the boys could always have the memory years after they had grown out of the toys.   So, I am thinking of trying at 365 day blog on the topic.   This is a test post, I needed to see how easy it is to use my tablet to photograph things and upload them here. It is extremely easy. So here is today's object. My old shoes:


  These shoes were bought in 2009, early in the year.  I was wearing them in April that year when I went to a rather fateful private view in Oxford.  They are Clarks shoes and were really comfortable for the first few years.    I stopped wearing them in winter 2014/5 by which time they had been mended about 3 times, and the upper was tearing away from the base of the shoe, again, and the cobbler refused to do them again.  I wore them all the time.  They weren't in the least lovely.  For a while I kept them near the back door for use in the garden, but they were too far gone - my feet got wet, the unlovely rubber clogs were more practical. 

I don't know if this picture does them justice - the backs weren't crushed like that - I was using them to slop about it indoors before I finally decided that my slippers were better.    A couple of weeks ago I bought some new winter shoes.  They are less lovely to look at than these, being lace up Hotters with thick soles and a slight hint of "surgical boot" about them.  

The only decision is whether to give the items their own blog, or to keep them here.  I think it's own blog might be more fun.  Yes - this is the address for the other blog   http://schmoozydeclutter.blogspot.co.uk/ but the first post is basically this, only written slightly more elegantly.