Resisting UKIP

Some of my comrades in the Stand up to UKIP group want to write a pamphlet - with the working title of "How we beat UKIP".  Although we have agreed that this will not be the title - I feel this highlights a fundamental issue.   My analysis of what happened in the general election in Thanet South is very different from theirs, and I don't think there is much chance of an honest discussion within the group of "what really happened" or the "truth" as the more philosophically inclined of us like to call it.

SUTU did a wonderful job in encouraging people to realise that they were not alone... and that we should try to resist the Purple Menace with all our might.  Despite my occasional suggestions that we should do something to undermine UKIP's attempts to seize the council, this was contradicted saying "Farage is our focus".  He didn't win the seat, but both Thanet District Council and Ramsgate Town Council are now dominated by UKIP.   Last night - at our post election meeting - it was said by several speakers that having a UKIP Council (the only one in the country) was somehow "a good thing" because it gave us a focus to continue the struggle.   It may well be - but I cannot see it being objectively a "good thing" for the people of Thanet.   It is "a good thing" perhaps that more people have been politicised and engaged than for a long time - but at what cost?

Personally I would rather not be continuing the struggle - personally I would like to be cultivating my own garden and not attending meetings etc.  I would like to do something useful, but I don't want to continue doing it this way, in this style, and I'm not sure whether the Labour party will be the place for me now either, as some people begin to salivate at the prospect of a return to Blairite values.

How did we "beat" UKIP?

I would love to believe that our relentless campaigning, leafletting, stall running, stickering, etc. had beaten UKIP.  I don't want to take any glory from the people who worked so hard (harder than me probably), but this is why I think we beat UKIP - or rather, why Farage was not elected.   I don't have statistics and so on to back me up - but this is how I analyse the election result here.

In 2010 the Conservatives won 48% of the votes and had a 6,600 approx majority over Labour; UKIP came 4th. with 2,500 approx.  This was after a boundary change had made the constituency a far safer Tory seat than it had been previously.  Labour won it in the 1997 landslide - and Ladyman held on to it, with tiny majorities, partly due to the benefit of being the incumbent.

I have no doubt that Laura Sandys would have comfortably won it if she had run this year.  It is a Conservative seat.  In this election a large number of Tories defected to UKIP as did a roughly similar number of Labour voters, and apparently most of the Lib Dems....The Tories held onto their seat - the polls were wrong, Will Scobie (Labour) didn't in fact have a realistic chance, and we were lucky we didn't have to vote Tory to defeat Nigel.   Many Tories dislike UKIP even more than we do.  Laura Sandys' Hate not Hope letter to the constituency may have been helpful - or it may have been too late to make any difference.   Perhaps SUTU prevented even more Labour people from defecting to UKIP, and perhaps dislike of Farage galvanized more people to come out and vote against him, or perhaps love of Farage encouraged traditional non-voters to come out and vote for him.

People love novelty.  They  don't like change when it's thrust upon them - but they like feeling that they can bring about change.  By getting the only UKIP council in the UK they have got a change of their own making.  We are hoping the council will screw up big time, indeed we are expecting it.  However, our definition of screwing up and the voters' definition are two different things.   Local Kippers may be emboldened by their success and delighted by what the council does (privatised litter fines for example).

No more glad, confident [Friday] morning...

For all these reasons I couldn't share the delight in the great moment when Farage lost on Friday morning.  Of course I was relieved and pleased, but not triumphant: because frankly, with a Tory government, and now a UKIP council there's not much to rejoice about, and the combined evil of these forces rather overwhelms my pleasure at seeing Farage depart from Fannet South in a puff of purple smoke never to be seen again - oh, until Monday, when he returned as the newly-re-elected Party Leader.  But at least he won't be coming here for his next crack at Parliament - which is why I say: Long life and Good Health to our Tory MP  vivat McKinlay!

SUTU - it's being so cheerful as keeps us going!

Spent the last two hours on Fb - trying to calm troubled waters, as well as provoking further turbulence... and being called a Nazi.  I am now so battle hardened by the whole social media thing that I barely noticed... or perhaps it was the port at supper that dulled my sensitivity.

So there was an hour or so of fire-fighting, messages, comments, sniping etc.  and then at last things calmed down, and then we all started making little jokes about the far-right who have been threatening us.  And all seemed sweetness and light again.

Of course, in my new discreet LP wannabe councillor guise, I cannot say more.  I suddenly realised that although I am not exactly prominent, being a "leader" of SUTU here (officially co-chair) will make me more of a juicy target for UKIP.  Then again, since I daresay a lot of kippers are not terribly hot on social media, they probably wouldn't know where to look - so I may be safe.

However, the truth is, the next two months will be a bit gritty.  I am more confident than ever that Nigel Farage will not get a seat here.  I wouldn't put it past him to do a flit to a more juicy prospect.  Then again, where would he find one?  Nationally their support is down to 11% and it's a bit of busted flush.  Maybe Carswell will be re-elected and struggle on as leader for a bit, but I would not be surprised to find him dropping out, or "discreetly" rejoining the Tories...

The Rozanne Duncan revelations were pure joy.  How can you be a councillor who denies services to black youth - because they are black - and say you aren't racist?  Clearly she has no understanding or insight - and is thus pretty typical UKIP material.

Really insulting UKIP is very infra dig. like shooting rats in a barrel really (or is that meant to be hard?  Rats move fast).

News from UKIPIA

Today's bulletin: well, actually this is slightly old news.  Of course we are all reeling with shock and surprise that UKIP has allowed a holocaust denying neo-fascist Polish party to form party of their coalition in the European parliament.... who could imagine that they would do such a thing!

But while I am in now way wishing to diminish that horror, the thing that gives us a really good taste of things to come in UKIPIA is a bit more subtle and domestic.

Once upon a time there was a concept called "the head of the household" - perhaps it is still used in some contexts.  Just as when a child answers the door, the electricity supply salesman will ask "Is your mummy home?" in the past, if a woman answered the phone to an official caller she might be asked "may I speak to the head of the house?".

It has an evocative historic ring to it...the head of the long house, ruling his extended family in some New Guinea clearing - or the Irish chieftain, presiding at his table, rod of office by his side.   But on the whole the question nowadays is "who pays the bills?" "Whose name is on the card?"   In our house that's effectively me.  I wouldn't say for a moment I was the head of the house though...or indeed that Mark was.   This usage died out at least 20 years ago.   So it was fascinating that when we received an electoral communication from UKIP it was addressed to M only.  I didn't get one - nor have any of my female friends - the men did though.  Presumably because they were "head of the household".   So us women needn't worry our pretty little heads about politics... our hubbies will consider the issues carefully - see that UKIP offers a "common sense" alternative and tell us how to vote.   I expect once they are in power they will take the vote away from us.  I think I ought to try to write to the Gazette about this...    Or maybe a special pink girly letter is coming out to us separately. I am keenly awaiting its arrival - perhaps it will have recipies on it?  or cleaning tips?

And once we've finished the hoovering - we can mow the lawn - we don't have time to go out and vote!

.

Welcom to UKIPIA - The UKIP Caliphate

I am coming to a gradual understanding of what the much discussed "caliphate" is.  It is roughly speaking a Utopian idea - the Golden Age returned to earth - when everything will be organised according to God's law and justice and peace will "return" (surely some mistake?) to the world.

This is of course, like all utopias, a marvellous idea (unless you examine some of the tenets of sharia law).  However, there have already been a number of caliphates, ruled by various caliphs, from the earliest days.  The first one lasted 30 years and ended in civil war.   Subsequent ones were the Ummayad one - which seems to have been reasonable - but also coincided with massive territorial expansion - to allow the infidel to share the delights of the caliphate!    More recently that horrendous breed of men, the Ottoman sultans, claimed the caliphate.  I doubt whether anyone could dispassionately judge Ottoman Turkey to be a society overflowing with peace and justice - the royal family itself was riven with hideous cruelty - how could they be the perfect divinely ordained rulers?

A caliph... perhaps the first one, Abu Bakr Siddique?

When ISIS proclaimed a caliphate, it was very far from the ideal.  The Koran has some harsh verses in it (as does virtually any religious text) but nothing that advocates the sort of behaviour they are indulging in.

So - perhaps a caliphate is better seen as an idealised version of a sharia state that will never come to pass. This is where UKIP comes in.   When I hear their nostalgic chat about what the UK should be like, I wonder if they too have a sort of utopian ideal of the UK, where everyone is English and happy, smiling and cheerful (this would make a change from the UKIP supporters, who tend towards the snarling, grumbling end of the spectrum - but perhaps that would all change in UKIPIA).    As well as there being no, or very few foreigners (wives and concubines of leading party members would be permitted to remain - as long as they continued to please these potentates) we would be living on English produce from our own fields, and having our own nuclear energy (instead of having to buy it from the detestable French), and we would be able to enslave people, and remove any of their human rights we chose to.  There wouldn't be much tax, but there wouldn't be any services any way - everything would have to be paid for.  Women wouldn't work, unless they were very old and unlikely to require maternity leave.   Education would be optional after 12 and useful apprenticeships in mining and the chimney sweeping sector would become widely available.  The sea would gradually become disgustingly polluted, because we would have opted out of oppressive EU water purity standards, there would be a great deal of other pollution, as smoking in public places would be encouraged again.

Homesexuals would be "discouraged" - and would find themselves spending more time indoors, if not actually in the closet, since there would be few penalties for those who harmed them. Economically UKIPIA would be a bit of a mess as we would be losing a great many of our export markets.  We would not have the income to import foreign goods - especially foodstuffs, which would gradually become more expensive.  Luxury goods have become more expensive, due to the taxes on them - which doesn't worry ordinary people at first - until the definition of "luxury" is extended to include cat litter, deodorant and lavatory paper. The sales of skin whiteners that had gone through the roof as people attempted to diminish their ethnicity, now floundering as they too are taxed at luxury rates.

It becomes more apparent that the senior party members are living a rather more luxurious lifestyle than ordinary people - and although most of them are not career politicians, but also run small businesses of their own, still there is talk of UKIP MPs cheating on expenses.   Nevertheless, election publicity shows happy smiling faces, and even fat people (most of whom have disappeared since biscuits, cakes, fish and chips and Diet Coke were declared a "luxury good" and attracted the top rate of tax.

This is just off the top of my head of course, further research in the UKIP manifesto will no doubt reveal more.   Meanwhile - remember, only 13% of the population are immigrants (it's probably only 5% in Thanet)... .  The fact is, their fantasy British caliphate, will emerge just as unjust and cruel as any other similar regime... I just hope that UKIPIA will remain a fantasy for a very long time.

The important thing to remember about the word Utopia is that it is concocted from the Greek ou topos - No Place!  

The UKIP manifesto

I must confess I haven't read the UKIP manifesto - but there was a rather good brief version of it - focussing obviously on the less caring aspects - in a local website - I reproduce it here as an aide memoire for future use in the General Election perhaps.  I haven't heard yet whether Farage will stand here.  Do hope not, but we'll see.

Well done UKIP voters - did you actually know what you were voting for? 
He's a wee list for starters:-
- scrap paid maternity leave
- scrap paid holiday entitlement
- cut education spending 
- increase military spending 
- decriminalise marital rape
- withdraw from the Human Rights Act
- cancel all current house building projects
- abandon baking regulations - risking another banking 
crisis
- stop all renewable energy projects
- halt climate change action
- promote fracking
- privatise the NHS 
- abolish the Scottish Parliament 
and that's just some of their intentions!

YOU DID CHECK THAT OUT BEFORE YOU PUT YOUR CROSS IN THE BOX, DIDN'T YOU?? 

Those are clearly the worst bits... 

UKIP

I don't really want to write about UKIP - I've been writing and arguing about them intermittently today on Facebook.

Anyone who thinks Facebook is all kittens and video clips doesn't see my pages.  There are very tough political slogging matches going on.  It's been lucky that I've had a good friend who shares my views doing a lot of the heavy lifting - and in some cases it was her statuses that provoked these fights.   Part of me just wishes that UKIP supporters would just shut up about it - but they've won the majority of the seats - they feel entitled to gloat - those of them who were more discreet before the results are now strutting about and going for fitting for their new uniforms (I jest!).

Although UKIP strenuously tries to distance itself from neo-fascist groups such as NF and BNP the more it protests, the more we are counting the spoons.... the fact is that it has attracted their supporters (as well as many disaffected Tories and Labour voters) is a small thing, the worse thing, I think, is that it has enabled people who are pretty racist to find an outlet and to express their opinions.

The people who say "I'm not a racist but...." mean that they probably wouldn't use the N- word - but that's now the only definition of a racist - feeling alienated from foreigners, unable to make them welcome - yes, it's xenophobia - but it often covers a racist set of beliefs.   These xenophobes are Ukippers - they aren't educated, cosmopolitan or sophisticated.  Are they nice, kind, decent people?  Perhaps - to their own kind - they would probably help out if they saw a foreigner in trouble - wouldn't they?   They aren't monsters surely.

Nevertheless, I am feeling as alienated from them as Nigel Farage would from a household of Romanian men - Ukipophobia... Sadly, I have rather exhausted my energies on them on Facebook - but my overall view is that this victory is voters who perhaps don't really understand how Euro elections work voting for people who aren't going to work in the European Parliament - so rather a waste of time.  Probably some voters think if they can get enough UKIP MEPs elected they will be able to change European legislation - well yes, but...

Apparently UKIP are going to overhaul their policies - at present they are trying to present themselves as a party of the politically marginalised working classes - who are ignored by the media and Westminster.  If the working class took a close look at their agenda and manifesto they might wonder how getting rid of sick pay and the minimum wage was going to help the working classes exactly? This is because UKIP are not of course a working class party - they are a Poujardiste petit-bourgeois small business persons' party.... their interests are limited to making themselves richer and letting the weakest go to the wall.  Again not something most ordinary British people are totally enamoured of - we are famous for liking under dogs - I don't think we've lost that yet.   Perhaps we are safe.

I certainly don't believe they will make significant gains in a General Election in 2015 - barring some unforeseen horror... However, Nigel F is making the most of his victory - crowing that it is the first time a third party has won a "national election" for a 100 years.  Pas grand chose really - EU elections are not exactly national elections - correctly it should be "won a majority in the national section of a Europe-wide election".  But the truth isn't always a good sound-bite is it?

The Resistible Rise of Nigel Farage

Nigel Farage is a superficially "impish" version of a type that I find familiar, latterly from the ghastly networking breakfasts that I used to go to when I was trying to set up a business.   He is a commercial person who has not got much intellectual training behind him, and has spent his life concluding that what his "common sense" tells him must be right and true, because all the chaps in the saloon bar or at the nineteenth hole agree with him, largely because, like him, they are not strong on critical faculties, and their knowledge of the world, society, humanity, economics is restricted to the small number of things they have experienced.

Their views are comforting, because they do not encounter opposition or disagreement, since most of the people they meet are either their employees, or people similar to them.  When they do meet someone who disagrees, they can easily dismiss them as a "leftie" or a "nutter", or, perhaps a "foreigner".  

We all have a bit of "them-ism" in us.  Few of us can agree with the humani nil a me alienum puto (I don't find anything human is alien to me) of Terence - we all have our prejudices, our dislikes (one of mine being heavily blinkered small businessmen).  UKIP seems composed of people who have formed a party against everything and everyone that challenges their limited worldview.  Unhappily, there are many other people in the country who have had even fewer opportunities to understand the world and are happy to follow UKIP's lead.   Something is rotten in the state of England, and unfortunately it cannot all be put down to a scheming uncle.

If, as shorthand, and on the understanding that this is an over-simplification, I refer to the typical UKIP candidate/activist as a small businessman (women too sadly) then a great deal of their policy becomes clear. For years there have been various spokesmen (not women usually) for the Federation of Small Business(men) interviewed on the radio on phone-ins and consumer programmes, and they have usually argued fiercely against any improvement in conditions for workers... no statutory sick pay, no maternity leave, compassionate leave, flexible working, job-shares, paternity leave, adoptive parent leave.  Left to them, children would still be drawing coal trucks underground and going up chimneys.  Of course, not all small business operators are the same: we don't have employees in our business, Architectural Archaeology, so we haven't been destruction tested on these issues.

These views, dictated by common sense and self-interest have been transferred wholesale into the UKIP manifesto.  In addition, they apparently wish to privatise the NHS.   This is wonderfully Un-English/British of them.  It has long been known that large sections of the population would probably go to the stake for the NHS - it has been apotheosized during the 2012 Olympic opening ceremony.  Yes, GPs make mistakes (bad ones), yes people die, yes, there are useless individuals in the system - welcome to the real world... but on the whole, the UK is very proud of the NHS and loves it, warts and all.   Yet UKIPers, who claim to love their country, would deliver their fellow citizens to unaffordable insurance and illness and toothache and so on so that they could save a bit of money.

Why?  Because UKIPers are not really for anyone except themselves.  Their agenda is to reduce their own expenditure - they will pay less tax under their regime, unhealthy, disabled babies will not be born to be a burden on the state, the small businessmen will not have to subsidise the feckless and weak who get ill, or manage to have accidents, and this will mean more money for them.

This whole Poujardiste agenda is actually half-concealed, while they use people's ignorance and anxiety about "them" - whether these are Eastern European gypsies, or famine dodging Sudanese, to attract attention and support. The EU is composed of foreigners, so they can't care about us, so they must be screwing us in some way.  Foreigners wish to come here to work - how very dare they?!  Who would have thought people were so frightened about schools being full, about having to wait a little longer for a doctor?  Whatever happened to British pluck?  We are now such a nation of snivelling ninnies apparently, that we will tolerate suffering people being refused asylum, rather than have to spend an extra 30 minutes in an NHS waiting room.

UKIP shamefully like to try and use Christianity too - not because they are Christians, but to highlight the fact that they are not Muslims.  When Jesus said "who is my brother?" he meant everyone was, not just a few special people who were his siblings.  But if you ask Nigel and his chums "who is your brother?" their answer would probably be "Fuck 'em, I'm an only child."   Who was it who said the only true interest is self-interest?  The trouble with UKIPers is, they don't really have any other interests.